|
Do you have what
it takes to make a Critical Connection?
By: Gerard
Lavery Lederer, Esq., CAE; BOMA International
The Telecommunications
Act of 1996 created a new and dynamic nexus between telecommunications,
technology, tenant attraction and retention. It also created a new series
of business connections that have grown to be critical: property management
professionals, tenants, TSPs (telecommunications service providers) and
building owners. Each of these parties have come together with the goal
of brokering critical connections to the information age. While each party
recognizes the primary goals of their connection - enhanced tenant satisfaction,
market share for the TSP and the generation of value for ownershipthey
have not always agreed on how to reach all three goals simultaneously.
In an effort to provide
a solution to this challenge, BOMA in partnership with Riser Management,
OnSite Access, MetroMedia Fiber and SBC have published Critical Connections:
The Property Management Professional's Guide to Partnering in the Information
Age. The book seeks to answer the following questions:
What telecom services
do my customers want?
How can I
add value to a TSP's bottom line so that they will assist me with mine?
How do I demonstrate
to owners that I understand valuation equations and can maximize their
long-term return on investment?
Part One
Before you can make
a critical connection you must first accept the realities of the marketplace
and know the rules by which the market is governed. Part One of Critical
Connections will seek to demonstrate what a property management professional
must do to be able to answer the question "Am I ready to do business in
this new marketplace?" The following questions will assist you in determining
whether you are ready:
Have you inventoried
your building's telecom assets?
Have you surveyed
your tenants to ascertain their current and future space demands?
Do you know
who has space commitments on your building's roof risers?
Have you determined
market prices and/or trends for your telecom assets?
If you can't answer
all of these questions in the affirmative, you are not alone. Critical
Connections will give you all you need to do business.
Part Two
In Part Two of Critical
Connections, BOMA and its research partners seek to establish what telecommunications
services tenants are demanding and property owners are offering. Further,
the start of the new millenium, with four years having elapsed since passage
of the landmark Telecommunications Reform Act of 1996, demanded the creation
of a valid baseline against which progress in deploying new telecommunications
services might be measured in the years to come.
The nexus of tenant
attraction and retention, telecommunications and technology has assumed
a high level of importance to property professionals in general, and the
BOMA membership in particular. This may be best reflected in the level
of participation in this research project. From the 10,000 copies of the
Owner/Manager survey distributed between November 1, 1999 and January
7, 2000, BOMA received 1,097 surveys back - about an eleven (11%) percent
return rate. From the 10,000 copies of the Tenant Survey, BOMA received
back 642, almost a six and one half (6.5%) percent return.
The owner sample represents
just less than 400 million square feet of office space drawn from records,
representing 2,097 buildings. The average building size was 190,545 square
feet. Finally, from a search of all available literature, this is the
largest telecom related study of office tenants conducted to date.
Lessons (to be)
Learned
Tenant Needs
Tenants' demands
may be reduced to four simple messages. Tenants want:
Choice among
telecommunications service providers (TSPs).
Enhanced
Internet access speed as the tenant community marches to true broadband
connectivity.
Choices
in enhanced telecommunications services and providers at little or
no additional rent.
Flexibility
in property management responses and in the adaptability of their
leased space.
Office size
and a tenant's business are two leading factors in determining required
access speed. Very few tenants viewed choice among telecommunications
service providers in choosing an office space, but are increasingly
employing their presence as a determining factor on renewal.
Brand loyalty
for a TSP is low, and will only rarely be a determining factor in
lease location or renewal decision-making process.
Tenants view
the building owner as facilitating access to telecommunications services,
but have not viewed an owner as a provider of such services. This
is either terrific news for building offered telecommunications programs,
as there is a large unmet market need, or reflects a huge challenge
in marketing for such services if they are to be viewed as a valuable
service to tenants.
Technology
is assisting a growing number of tenants to employ alternative officing
strategies. Still, seventy-two (72%) percent of the tenants indicated
no impact on their need for office space. In fact fifteen (15%) percent
of the respondents indicated that telecommunications services resulted
in an increase in their need for space.
Tenant --Owner
Relations
Owners' actions
appear to be in step with tenant demands. The leading services offered
are the same, as the leading services demanded. Some confusion appears,
however, on what services owners plan to offer next and what tenants
actually say they need.
Competitive local
phone service and Internet access are the leading applications both
in terms of tenant demand and building's offerings.
Owners are not
looking to tenants to pay additional rents for the presence of additional
telecommunications services. Ninety-five (95%) percent have indicated
that they have not increased rent for additional services. Of the five
(5%) percent of owners that did raise rates based on telecomm service
providers being available, the most common increase was in the minimal
category.
The message to
building owners and managers is clear, if you are going after large
office tenants, your building must have high speed Internet capabilities.
Tenant demand
is a strong determinant as to which TSP gains access to a building.
Ninety-eight (98%) percent of the tenants responding to our survey indicated
that building management procured services from a particular TSP when
they asked.
Over eighty 80%
of buildings have more than a single TSP providing service with almost
60% of the buildings offering access to three or more providers. Some
buildings offer as many as 15 TSPs.
Value Equation
Owners believe
there to be a strong connection between advanced telecom features, improved
tenant retention, and marketability of their buildings.
Tenants' responses
appear to validate this belief, but like competition, telecommunications
choice as a leasing and renewal decision-making variable is a relatively
new phenomenon.
Tenants want
choice but are not ready to pay for it. A building owner looking to
recapture value in the near term must rely most heavily on payment from
TSP.
Owner --TSP Relations
The nexus of
real estate and competitive telecommunications offerings is embryonic.
Fifty-eight percent of buildings' competitive services are less than
two years old and three out of every four competitive offerings are
less than four years old.
Building owners
are not universally recapturing the value of their telecommunications
property through rent, but it is growing practice.
Flat rents have
been the traditional method for setting access fees (80.9%), but revenue/success
sharing is gaining rapidly in the marketplace as the traditional means
for recapturing value.
Owners agree
with TSPs in that their presence in a building adds value. Neither party,
however, seems to have developed a methodology for ascertaining that
value resulting in confusion in the market.
Owners-TSP relations
are long term. The average of the initial term for an access agreement
is slightly longer than five years. This compares favorable with the
six-month cancellation notice most owners have with their professional
property management partners.
Owner -- TSP Negotiations
It takes longer
to negotiate license agreements between a building owner and a TSP than
it does with either building tenants or traditional non-telecommunications
service providers.
Owners concerns
in moving forward with TSPs may be identified in three major components:
buildings' physical limitations, security/access, and the negotiation
process.
To gain access
a successful TSP must demonstrate: Quality/Reliability of Service, a
history of customer service and a request from an existing tenant. The
willingness of a TSP to compensate the building owner came in fourth
in the list of decision points.
TSPs would do
well to invest in building owner education on access issues as the leading
sticking points in owner TSP relations are access negotiations, sales
techniques, owners' lack of knowledge regarding services, technology
and market value of building telecom space.
Tenant TSP Relations
Tenants most
frequently use a RFP/Competitive Bid Process to procure service from
TSPs.
In choosing an
ISP, reliability is almost twice as important to a tenant than price.
Reliability and
price were in a statistical tie when ranked in importance of choosing
a TSP.
Company name
or brand recognition came in very near the bottom in decision-making
drivers.
Tenants are taking
a long-term view toward technology and how it best meets their needs.
Paid advertising has a large role to play in that decision-making process,
but most tenants rely upon their internal MIS department for new service
information.
Part Three
In the last section
of Critical Connections, our research partners provide the reader with
case studies on how they have assisted property management professionals
address their critical connections. While the rules and regulations outlined
in Part One and the knowledge to be gained from the survey analysis in
Part Two are great, property management professionals often ask BOMA International
for examples of solutions. Part Three begins the process of meeting that
challenge.
The Living Book
When we say Part
Three begins the process, we mean it! Critical Connections is a living
document that will be supplemented on a regular basis, but not necessarily
in print. While for instance in Wired for Profit, we included model license
agreements for use by the reader. In Critical Connections, we offer you
a web site (www.boma.org) to visit which will provide downloadable copies
of such license agreements. By doing so BOMA International offers the
reader the latest ideas, not necessarily the latest ideas at the time
the book went to press.
And all the ideas
and references both in this books and on websit may not necessarily be
from BOMA International. You will note that the glossary of this book
is very limited to core terms that the reader will need to understand
the text, but that the reader is directed to http://www.winstar.com/info/content_glossary.asp
for more information. This web location that BOMA is directing the reader
to is an on-line glossary maintained by Winstar.
Finally, if you
have ideas on what should be on the Critical Connections web link, send
those ideas to glederer@boma.org. To order your copy of the book
visit BOMA homepage at www.boma.org or call 800-426-6292.
About
the author
Gerard Lavery Lederer,
Esq., CAE is Vice President, Research, Government and Industry Affairs
with BOMA International. The author may be reached via email at: glederer@boma.org
|