Video Teleconferencing – Has the time come for this technology?

By Joe Scotti, AUDITEL

 

This is part one of a three-part article, which will discuss video teleconferencing (VTC) technologies.

 

I have been involved in video teleconferencing technologies (VTC) since 1985 when I created a pilot program for one of our healthcare clients.  This pilot’s objective was to successfully demonstrate the transmission of audio/video and images, including x-rays and CAT scan films between the hospital and a physician’s office.  Think about this:  In 1985 a VTC system carried a price tag of around $85,000 per site.  Needless to say, because of high cost of the equipment and the many issues surrounding patient record confidentiality, the pilot program (albeit technically successful) never became a reality.  I guess we were light years ahead of our time.

 

When you consider the videoconferencing technology of today, things have dramatically changed.  But believe it or not, there still is a perception out there that the equipment and the telephone network required to transmit the audio/video and data signals are still cost prohibitive.  Nothing could be further from the case.

 

There is little doubt that videoconferencing technology is about to make its second debut. The Internet and IP videoconferencing will propel videoconferencing into a multi-billion dollar industry over the next five years primarily driven by applications.  There are applications being conceived by savvy users who have an appetite for huge amounts of bandwidth and “digital TV” quality video and audio.

 

Let’s take a step back for a moment and begin to discuss the various forms of videoconferencing, applications and some costs considerations.  Of course one-way videoconferencing (or broadcast) started with that wireless appliance in your home many years ago, the television.  It was clear back then, wireless audio broadcasting (the radio) was such a big hit, that many entrepreneurs thought by putting a picture(s) behind the words would revolutionize the media industry.  And of course they were correct  Believe it or not the television can take most of the blame (or credit) for enhancing the way people receive their communication from the outside world.

 

In the early 1980’s, a few high-tech companies (PictureTel, Vtel and Intel) began to explore “two-way” television broadcasting, aka video teleconferencing or videoconferencing.  The thinking behind this invention was to reduce travel and provide some efficiency for meetings and training for businesses with multiple locations.  Thus the first videoconferencing system was born.

 

 

Of course, at that time no standards had been developed.  So in order to “make a video call” you needed to have a similar system at the far end and a dedicated network between both locations.  A few years later, a digital telephone network service started to surface from the local telephone companies that could connect these devices together and allow them to make an audio/video call over the PSTN (Public Switched Telephone Network). This service was called ISDN.  Shortly after this service was deployed in the US, it became tainted as a phone service that did not work and took months to install and configure.  ISDN (Integrated Service Digital Network) became known as, “ I Still Don’t Know.”

 

Finally the Bell Operating Companies got their act together and began working with the hardware manufacturers and the industry and developed a standard: H.320.  With an H.320 compatible videoconferencing system, any user utilizing ISDN can call anyone, anywhere that has a similar device and an ISDN line.

 

As the years went by, the video quality, know as frames per second (FPS), began to improve and 15 FPS was not uncommon.  Keeping in mind that VCRs or TVs transmit at around 30 FPS.  In addition, the audio hardware within the system was designed with echo cancellation, amplifiers and audio mixers.  But the equipment remained costly and the usage associated with the ISDN network was expensive. 

 

As new players like Tandberg and Polycom began to enter the market in the late 90’s, prices finally began to fall and the systems became technologically superior. 

 

What is the make-up of VTC system?

 

A typical H.320 videoconferencing system comes with the codec (coder/decoder), which is the brains (CPU) of the system, a pan, tilt and zoom camera, at least one microphone and a television monitor (usually 30 inches or large) with built-in speakers.   A full compliment of peripherals can be purchased with the system, like document cameras, electronic white boards, projection systems, video streaming servers.  A system configured like this sold for $50,000-$100,000 as recently as two or three years ago.  Now they can be purchased for less than $10,000. In addition, line and usage costs for ISDN have dropped dramatically.  

 

In our next article, I will discuss H.323 video teleconferencing or IP Video.  Stay tuned!

 

BACK TO NOVEMBER ISSUES